Pragmatism is an old philosophy; however, its role in education has
come between the 19th & 20th century. Many philosophers such as William
Kilpatrick, George Counts, and Boyd Bode built this philosophy's education
structure; and the creative philosophers John Dewy integrated philosophy with
education. (Sharma, Devi, & Kumari, 2018)
The word "pragmatism" is of Greeks origin and it means
"work". Pragmatist believes that truth is observable; thus, it may
change. For it, truth is absolutely relative and can change according to the
happening situations. Dewey claimed that teachers in democratic society must
have diverse methods of teaching, where each method might work for a student
and might not work for another one. Therefore, pragmatism believes in diversity
of students, their thinking of their instruction methods. (Sharma, Devi, & Kumari, 2018)
According to pragmatism, educative process is all about activity
and experience. Pragmatism believes that education system is always going
forward. It’s always in progress, and progress refers to change, and change
involves more novelty. Therefore, knowledge cannot be given at once. The
educative process, then, is pragmatic; which means it is gradual and experimental. (Sharma, Devi,
& Kumari, 2018)
There are five educational implications in pragmatism:
Pragmatism believes that the traditional way of teaching became
useless. Education is about reorganization, reconstruction, and combination of
the race experiences. It wants to maintain the culture of the past, think of
solutions to force new situations, then integrate both of them. Thus, knowledge
can be only gained through experiments, activities, and life experiences. (Sharma, Devi,
& Kumari, 2018)
In pragmatism view, child is not born as a blank paper; however, he
is born with abilities and tendencies that can be brought out by education.
Thus, education is only a mediator between the child's mental ideas and the
external world. (Sharma, Devi, & Kumari, 2018)
For pragmatism, social relationships can teach the human being more
than books. Thus, children must be educated in a social medium that develops
them socially to reach happiness and satisfaction. (Sharma, Devi, & Kumari, 2018)
Pragmatism believes that education is a journey, not a destination.
It's a process of gaining knowledge through reconstruction and adjustment of an
experiment. (Sharma, Devi, & Kumari, 2018)
For Pragmatism, it's any state responsibility to make education a
right for any child. Without this right, the state and its children will suffer
and fail in the future. (Sharma, Devi, & Kumari, 2018)
Pragmatism has no aims of education. It believes that education is
always in progress-always developing. Thus, its aim cannot be bounded; it’s
dynamic and subjective. For pragmatism, education is about dealing with human life,
so it must fulfill children’s need until they feel satisfied. Education should
train children to be able to adjust themselves to the new environment when the
situations change. (Sharma, Devi, & Kumari, 2018)
Four principles have been described, by pragmatism, in this field:
Curriculum should include subjects, activities, and experiences
that children need and use in the present and future such as History, Science,
Physical training, Language, Geography, Physical wellbeing, and Home science
for girls. (Sharma, Devi, & Kumari, 2018)
Only activities and experiences that children are interest in
should be in the curriculum such as Art, Craft-work, Reading, Counting, Writing,
Natural science, and other simple nature practices. Dewey divided interests
into four categories: interest in conversation, interest in investigation, interest
in construction, and interest in creative expression. (Sharma, Devi,
& Kumari, 2018)
Child’s activity, career, and experience should be integrated, according
to this principle. Any curriculum should contain plenty of learning experiences
that improve the child’s thinking, personality, and confidence. (Sharma, Devi,
& Kumari, 2018)
According to pragmatism, subjects and activities should be
integrated; knowledge is one unit. An adjustable, changeable, and integrated
curriculum is a must, in pragmatists view, to help the child adapt when he develops,
society changes, and demands increase. (Sharma, Devi, & Kumari, 2018)
Pragmatism’s method of teaching is an activity-based method. For pragmatism,
knowledge can be gained through activities and experiments. When students learn
through experiments, they become creative, confident, cooperative, and prepared
for practical life. (Sharma, Devi, & Kumari, 2018)
Pragmatists depend on experimental methods of teaching where students
should discover the truth by themselves. This requires the application of
methods that encourage them to discover and increase their excitement toward
the truth. According to pragmatism, knowledge is gained through auto-education
or self-education method, where the role of teacher and book is secondary. They
only support and guide the students in activities. (Sharma, Devi,
& Kumari, 2018)
Pragmatism describes teacher as philosopher, helper to help
students improve and develop their talent abilities, and guide to guide them to
solve the problems that he suggests. (Sharma, Devi, & Kumari, 2018)
For pragmatism, discipline is about tracking the child’s interests.
Teacher and student, both cooperate to solve a problem which shows that
education is a social process. In this process, teacher suggests the problem
and guides the pupil but all work is done by the pupil. Even in group work, all
are equal; there are no rewards or punishments for any student. (Sharma, Devi,
& Kumari, 2018)
9. References
o Sharma, S., Devi, R., &
Kumari, J. (2018, February 4). Pragmatism in Education. ICNFESMH-2018
(pp. 74-79). India: OM Institute of Technology & Management.